DoJ Obscenity Charges

http://fleshbot.com/377992/belladonnas- … -squirting http://www.boingboing.net/2008/04/10/fe … count.html http://www.xbiz.com/news/news_piece.php?id=92298 http://vegasblog.latimes.com/vegas/2008 … as-pr.html http://avn.com/law/articles/29534.html

One of the major pornography distributors has been charged with eight counts for basically producing porn. Naturally, this is the results of a highly useful efforts of our country, but let’s leave that alone. The videos in question are basically anal ones, enemas and “milk products” and something I consider quite tame. However, it is the idea that something I consider a mild fetish is being dragged up to court. Under obscenity.

The avn.com/law link has a really good analysis.

For some reason, I’m beginning to really hate the idea of “obscenity” in laws. It seems so… subjective.

NEXT POST

The “advantages” of having someone in charge who represents people who want to “clean up America”.