DoJ Obscenity Charges
http://fleshbot.com/377992/belladonnas- … -squirting
http://www.boingboing.net/2008/04/10/fe … count.html
http://www.xbiz.com/news/news_piece.php?id=92298
http://vegasblog.latimes.com/vegas/2008 … as-pr.html
http://avn.com/law/articles/29534.html
One of the major pornography distributors has been charged with eight counts for basically producing porn. Naturally, this is the results of a highly useful efforts of our country, but let’s leave that alone. The videos in question are basically anal ones, enemas and “milk products” and something I consider quite tame. However, it is the idea that something I consider a mild fetish is being dragged up to court. Under obscenity.
The avn.com/law link has a really good analysis.
For some reason, I’m beginning to really hate the idea of “obscenity” in laws. It seems so… subjective.
NEXT POST
The “advantages” of having someone in charge who represents people who want to “clean up America”.